July 31, 2008
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act
The U.S. House of Representatives voted (326-102) to give the FDA regulatory control over tobacco. Now get this… Philip Morris USA, which thinks regulation by the Food and Drug Administration will help shore up its position as the leading cigarette manufacturer, endorsed this big government move to further nationalize the tobacco industry.
The bill specifically states that the F.D.A.’s new powers would stop short of the ability to order the elimination of nicotine from tobacco products or place an outright ban on all tobacco products. But the agency could reduce nicotine to nonaddictive levels. The F.D.A. could also require changes in tobacco products, like the reduction or elimination of other ingredients it chooses, such as a ban on flavored cigarettes that appeal to young people.
The bill was opposed by many Republicans who said they objected to expansion of the federal bureaucracy, and complained in particular that the F.D.A. was already unable to fulfill its work overseeing pharmaceuticals and food. Consider the FDA's recent wanton destruction of the tomato industry following the salmonella outbreak that sickened some 1,300 people in the U.S. and Canada.
"This is truly an historic day in the fight against tobacco," said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), who co-sponsored the measure with Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.). "Regulating tobacco is the single most important thing that we can do right now to protect the public health of all Americans, especially our children."
There's that "for the children" argument again that Socialists in government love to use.
Representative John D. Dingell, said that it was hard to believe that the nanny state had not yet regulated the tobacco industry.
Proponents such as John R. Seffrin, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, hailed the approval as a historic and crucial step in the effort to control the private activities of American citizens. These anti-tobacco propagandists have thrived on slick marketing tactics and misleading the public about the harms of its products.
Enough is never enough for these globalists who want to control every aspect of our lives and drive our Constitutional Republic further into the annals of history.







1 Comment on Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act »
October 31, 2008
Patriot Smoker @ 2:40 pm:
A three-year, $7 million neuromarketing study done in Oxford, England has found that cigarette health warning labels actually make smokers want to smoke more, not less. Neuromarketing research studies how the brain reacts to various types of marketing stimuli. Researchers studied 2,000 people from five different countries using sophisticated brain-testing technology, like electroencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to gain a better understanding of consumer behavior. A surprising finding involved the health warning labels placed on cigarette packs. Researchers asked subjects if the warning labels worked to help them reduce smoking, and most said "yes." But when they repeated the same question while flashing images of the labels to the subjects while they underwent an MRI, they found that the images activated "craving spots" in the brain, indicating that the health warnings actually encourage smokers to smoke more.